Newspaper Ads from the 7 Rivers Region Classifieds from the 7 Rivers Region Jobs in the 7 Rivers Region Cars in the 7 Rivers Region Homes for Sale in the 7 Rivers Region Rental PRoperties in the 7 Rivers Region & Rivers Region Website Directory Shopping in the 7 Rivers Region
 SPONSOR LINKS
spacer

PRINT ADS

spacer
 Home > News > Story

Published - Thursday, June 05, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (8 comment(s))

Tralmer building roof worked on, rebuilding plan still undecided

   Advertisement   
Advertise Info. Website Directory
.
Ronald and Don Tralmer are inching closer to a deal with their insurance company and hope to soon be able to rebuild the Tralmer Building, which suffered a partial roof collapse from snowfalls in December.

They are not yet sure,

however, how they plan to repair the structure. Despite delays, some work has already been done. The damaged portion of the roof was taken down last week to reduce the risk of potential hazards.

“The first thing was to get the damaged part down so we can s

atisfy the city as far as the hazard part of the building,” Ronald Tralmer said. “We have taken some walls down, too, to where they are solid and straight.”

Tralmer also said that they have nearly worked out a deal with their insurance company. He said th

at it is not totally clear from that point what the building repairs will consist of.

“We may take the top of the building right off and put on a roof so we just have one floor and a basement,” Tralmer said. “We have had some people interested in purchasi

ng the building as is and rehabbing it. We are looking at that option and just playing it by ear.”

A structural engineer has already been contacted and looked at the Tralmer Building before the damaged portion of the roof was taken down. Tralmer said that

a structural engineer will return to reassess the structure.

The Tralmer Building, which has stood since the 1920s, was condemned on Dec. 26, 2007, after heavy snows caused a portion of the roof to cave in. The Tralmers planned to rebuild the structure sin

ce it was condemned, but ran into delays as an insurance deal could not be reached in February.
.
   Advertisement   
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

wendy knutson wrote on Jun 12, 2008 7:27 PM:

" I think we also need to take into consideration that if the building is condemned, will the Tralmers lose all of the equity in the building? If so I do not blame them for wanting to repair it and have the insurance pay for it. If they have owned the building for so many years, they deserve the equity in the building. This is why we pay for insurance. Remember a building is an investment. "

Look Around wrote on Jun 9, 2008 7:51 PM:

" How long did it take for the Cooper brothers to do anything with their condemned and contaminated property by the railroad tracks? Much longer than this situation (by years and years). No one is being hurt by a couple of month's investigation into repair and costs. Bloggers just like to gripe -- especially if they can throw in a "good ol' boy" here and there. I wouldn't want to be in their shoes -- it's not like they're going to make a fortune on this deal no matter what. Anyone who owns a business, deals with a catastrophe, and/ or has to deal with regulations is smart enough to know this is a no-win situation. And everyone who owns a business, deals with the public, and/ or has to deal with regulations deserves a fair shake. "

Good Old Boys wrote on Jun 8, 2008 9:40 AM:

" How come the Tralmers can get away with taking their good natured time with that building? If it was anybody else in this town they wouldn't have been given this long to take care of it. As I see it, it's who you know in this city and than let's just sit on it for 6 months before we do anything.The city needs to force them to tear the building down, it's condemned and uninhabitable, anybody else wouldn't of had this long to decide what they were going to do with it if they owned it. The city of Tomah doesn't the gall to make them do that,because the mayor and the Tralmers are drinking buddies and they are working for each other. Get rid of the eye sore once and for all, before somebody get seriously hurt. "

Nuisance wrote on Jun 7, 2008 8:35 PM:

" It doesn't matter who owns the building, and the issue between the Owner and insurance is not a public matter, but the bottom line is there is a very unsafe building in downtown Tomah that has also turned into a downtown eyesore if not a public nuisance.
Glad to see something finally being done and it appears the City was way to patient on this property. "

Come on wrote on Jun 7, 2008 8:39 AM:

" Nothing against the Tralmer's but this is ridiculous. This building was condemned and they want the insurance to pay?? How about they fix it or tear it down and replace it. Why wait for the "insurance" company??? That's a poor excuse. They have made a mint out off this town and they want special favors to make more?? Tear the building down or repair it, but dont wait on the insurance. I'm sure they are known well enough to be able to finance a project like that. Insurance companies are for profit now, if you have an accident, you, the victim, may get your medical bills paid but NEVER do you come out ahead like the "good ole day's". Between attorney's and the hospital bills that come out of your settlement and IF their is any left you may get a dime or still be $$$$ in the hole. The insurance companies side together, they don't represent individual's any more. So, why would they pay money on a building that is worthless??? "

Ace wrote on Jun 6, 2008 10:37 PM:

" I worked for Ron Tralmer for several years and I have to say that he was not only one of the BEST bosses I've ever had, but he's by far one of the finest men I've ever had the pleasure to know. It's a shame that the Tralmer issue has to make the newspapers when there are so many other things in this town to deal with. Leave this man alone, let him retire in peace as he deserves, and get on with your own issues!! "

money wrote on Jun 6, 2008 8:18 AM:

" so in other words, they did what they had to so the city would get off their backs. Now they are trying to get more money out of the insurance company to fix it as cheaply as they can to make money on the building. No matter what you do to the building Tralmers will never get the price they think they should for it. But I guess they can keep hoping and trying to pinch all the money they can out of other people instead of their pockets. "

bystander wrote on Jun 6, 2008 7:50 AM:

" Its nice to know that all the insurance you pay over the years, "STAND BY YOU"!!!

Good Luck to the Tralmers.... "


PLEASE NOTE: Comments on stories that frequently update through the day disappear with each update.
The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Tomah Journal.

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Log In - If you have already signed up with The Tomah Journal, please sign in now!
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, The Tomah Journal requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
*Address:
*City:
*State:
*Zip Code:
 

About Us | Advertise Online | Contact Us | Disclaimer | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | RSS | Webmaster | Website Directory
Copyright © 2006 The Tomah Journal. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.