Newspaper Ads from the 7 Rivers Region Classifieds from the 7 Rivers Region Jobs in the 7 Rivers Region Cars in the 7 Rivers Region Homes for Sale in the 7 Rivers Region Rental PRoperties in the 7 Rivers Region & Rivers Region Website Directory Shopping in the 7 Rivers Region
 SPONSOR LINKS
spacer

PRINT ADS

spacer
 Home > Opinion > Story

Published - Sunday, July 06, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (6 comment(s))

Column: Gap between rich and poor continues to grow

   Advertisement   
Advertise Info. Website Directory
.
“We just can’t make it.” The man spoke in barely a whisper. “I am squeezed between the price of gas, food, health insurance, and property taxes; I can’t support my family on what I make. Is there anything you can do?”

People contact me with concerns about money. People are suffering. Reasons vary; sometimes related to personal decisions; sometimes troubles are part of bigger problems.

What is happening around us? Why do things feel worse?

I am researching wealth, taxes and possible alternatives to rein in growing property taxes. In the next few weeks I will share what I have learned. The numbers may surprise you. Today I begin with what I have learned about wealth.

People are squeezed between rising costs and falling wages.

Yes, even if you got a raise, it is likely costs are increasing faster than your raise. Minimum wage earners across the county received a raise last year. But the new federal minimum wage of $5.85 an hour is still 7% below (in real terms) where the minimum wage was a decade ago. (Wisconsin has a slightly higher minimum wage.)

A study released in April found wages at the lowest 10th (household income) have actually fallen since 2000. Wages for middle-income folks have been stagnant. The only growth in real wages happened for those making the top 20% of income.

For the average family, this means, despite raises, people are making less or just the same as they were eight years ago.

And we live in a country where the income gap between the rich and the poor is growing.

Another study released in December found that the average household in the top 1% of income saw a gain of $180,000 in their annual income in 2005. The $180,000 gain is more than four times the average income for a Wisconsin family for an entire year!

The report also showed record trends in this income gap: the share of the nation’s after-tax income going to the top 1% wealthiest households has hit the highest level on record; higher than 1929.

In 1979, the richest 1% made more than 23 times the poorest 20% of people. But by 2005 this number had grown -- the wealthiest 1% of households made 70 times more than the poorest five percent.

The nation’s share of income going to the bottom fifth of income earners is now the smallest on record. This is not only a story of the wealthiest and the poorest. The report also found that the middle fifth of households saw their share of income shrinking to the smallest on record. Average income for middle income households rose only 0.8% in 2005. This compares to an increase of 20.2% for the top 1% in the same year, which is the largest one year gain in 17 years -- or since data was available.

To put this all in perspective Lawrence Mishel, of the Economic Policy Institute, wrote last week “…in 1979 it took the highest-paid earners 12.4 days to make what most other earners did in a year, but by 2004 that feat was accomplished in a mere 3.7 days.”

Economists say the income gap is growing so fast in part because of changes in our tax laws.

Since 2001, changes in federal legislation have provided tax-payers with $1 trillion in tax cuts. The Tax Policy Center found that the wealthiest 1% of taxpayers saw an average tax cut of $44,200, or 5.4%, in 2006. Those making over $1 million saw an increase of 6% in after-tax income. This 6% is more than double the 2.5% increase in middle income households.

As a state legislator, I can't change federal tax policy. But I can help improve the fairness of our state tax system. Next week I will share what I’ve learned on the subject of Wisconsin’s taxes.

Democrat Kathleen Vinehout, Alma, represents the 31st state Senate District.
.
   Advertisement   
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

To twelve forty three pm wrote on Jul 10, 2008 2:21 PM:

" It is not a matter of fairness. If you want to lessen the impact on yourself, make more money. Don't expect the rich to throw more money in the kitty to make your life more comfortable. That is called socialism. A trip to Disneyworld would have more impact financially on the $20,000 per year income earner also. So, should Disney have a sliding scale of pricing? "

rere re tax cuts wrote on Jul 9, 2008 12:43 PM:

" And the impact of that 10% tax on the 20,000 income verses the 200,000 income?You want to claim the impact is fair? "

To ten thirty four am wrote on Jul 9, 2008 11:42 AM:

" Some people are saying rich people should pay a greater percentage, which is what I was disagreeing with. To take the argument in another direction, maybe the rich should just pay an equal amount of taxes? I mean, we all use the public roads, etc. Why should one person have to pay more for the upkeep than another just because they are successful? "

Re Re Tax Cuts wrote on Jul 9, 2008 10:34 AM:

" Look at what you just said in your own comments. You answered your own question.

"If I make $200,000 and you make $20,000, we should pay an equal percentage of our income."

Math: say we all pay 10%, just say for numbers purpose.
10% of $200,000 income = $20,000
10% of $20,000 income = $2,000

So yes, you are paying the equal percentage according to your statement, just not the equal amount.
Does that help clear it up for you? "

WHAT A SURPRISE wrote on Jul 3, 2008 7:09 PM:

" How much did they spend to find this out. The reagan and Republican trickle down is not trickling down. THis is the capitalist theory and is the perfect economy as far as the right is concerned. Maybe in another 10 or 15 years the rich will be SOOO rich that they will have some pitty and throw some money our way. I cant imagine anyone supporting the current system and mindset of the Republican party. Unless you are a millionaire but not very many Monroe cty people have that kind of money. "

Re Tax Cuts wrote on Jul 3, 2008 9:51 AM:

" Of course the wealthy saw the greatest benefit from the tax cuts. They pay more taxes, so they should. They actually pay more than their fair share. Why is this so? Why must they be penalized for being successful? If I make $200,000 and you make $20,000, we should pay an equal percentage of our income. But, the rich pay a greater percentage, which isn't right. If you want more money, do what the rich do: make more. "


The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Tomah Journal.

 Post a comment »

(optional)
   
Thank you for your comments! Once your comments are approved, they will appear on the site.
About Us | Advertise Online | Contact Us | Disclaimer | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | RSS | Webmaster | Website Directory
Copyright © 2006 The Tomah Journal. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.