SPONSOR LINKS
spacer

PRINT ADS

spacer

TOP HOMES

HomeSeller
Top Homes



TOP WHEELS

WHEELS
FOR YOU




 Home > News > Story

Published - Tuesday, August 19, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (24 comment(s))

Townships pass wind ordinances

   Advertisement   
Advertise Info. Website Directory
.
For several years, wind energy production has been an issue of debate in Monroe County. In 2006, the county passed an ordinance on wind turbines, but for some, the ordinance wasn’t enough.

Several townships in Monroe County have passed wind energy ordinances of their own this summer to create more specific guidelines on the location and decibel levels of wind turbines.

The Township of Wilton passed a Wind Energy Conversion Systems ordinance on July 8 after putting together a committee and looking at other ordinances from around the state.

“The ordinance is much more comprehensive than the county’s,” Wilton Town Chairman and Monroe County Dist. 8 Supervisor Rick Irwin said of Wilton’s 31-page ordinance. “The county ordinances are vague for someone that would apply for a conditional use permit as to where they can go.”

The ordinance states that under state law, electric generating facilities of less than 100 megawatts are subject to regulations enacted by counties and local units of government. The Town of Wilton is under the Monroe County Zoning and Wind Energy System Ordinance, which regulates such facilities. However, according to the Wilton ordinance, the county ordinance has insufficient standards to protect the public health and safety of the residents and property owners of Wilton.

“This was done in the interest of health and safety of the residents of the Town of Wilton,” Irwin said. “There is so much information out there. According to the county, wind turbines have to be at least 1,000 feet from someone’s home. We didn’t feel that cushion was long enough.”

The Wilton ordinance allows wind turbines to be no closer than 2,640 feet from a home, or any occupied building. It also does not allow turbines to be built any closer than 1,300 feet from a someone’s property line.

“We did some research, and a wind farm manufacturer thought that no one should be working within 1,300 feet of a wind tower,” Irwin said.

The ordinance also sets standards for such issues as decibel levels, aircraft protection, communications interference, roads, stray voltage, and groundwater protection.

A committee was put together to explore the effects of wind turbines, and Irwin said that anyone interested was invited to help with the development of the ordinance. While there has been debate from both sides of the wind power issue for the past several years in Monroe County, Irwin said that the committee heard little opposition during the development process.

“The public was welcome, and people came,” Irwin said. “But we didn’t see voiced opposition.”

The Township of Ridgeville passed a Wind Energy Conversion Systems Ordinance on Aug. 4. The first of a series of meetings by the Ridgeville Wind Tower Plan Commission was held in February. Steve Krueger, the chairperson, joined with five other people who were appointed to put the commission together.

Ridgeville Town Chairman Mike Luethe said that the commission took studies and evidence of what the Town of Ridgeville needed to do to draw up an ordinance to protect the township.

“One of the main components is the 1,000 feet set back from a home was moved back to a half-mile,” Luethe said. “The decibel levels were addressed, too. Things that were not put in the county ordinance, we put in this ordinance. We wanted to make sure we are protecting ourself.

While the issue of wind power in Monroe County will likely continue, the option of wind farms is a possibility. Now, in several townships, there will be increased regulation. Irwin said that he is open with wind turbines being built in the county, just as long as he feels that they meet regulation standards in the interest of safety.

“Anyone that would build them would have to adhere to the regulations and licensing, and I see no problem with wind turbines,” Irwin said. “This wasn’t done arbitrarily. We have a lot of information now, and turbines around the country that seem to be successful are the ones that are away from people.”
.
   Advertisement   
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

re scott wrote on Aug 26, 2008 11:41 AM:

" So, I guess a gas refinery would be okay with you or a nuclear plant? How about the health risks of solar pannels? "

Scott McElroy wrote on Aug 25, 2008 4:39 PM:

" From someone that has done extensive research on large wind turbines and the effects of people, I wish to say Congratulations to a job well done !
It is clear that those in charge considered the health & safety of its constituents and passed an ordinance appropriate to protect its own citizens.
For those of you that are clearly uneducated on the consequences of improperly sited large wind turbines, I suggest you research these giant industrial machines before your so quick to criticize those that have your best inertest at heart and to those that have voluntarily spent thousands of hours, researching the effects on humans.
For those so quick to criticize, I trust you are knowledgeable to such consequences as sound, stress, ice throw, decreased property values, medical effects, potential water well problems, stray voltage, destroyed roads, abandoned homes, bought out homes by the energy companies...I probably dont need to mention any more, because you already know.
These giant machine are being sited for one reason and it is going green alright, its to get as much green cash as possible. Once the GREEN subsidies stop, the going green with turbines will cease.
Energy companies need to site these giant machines properly. The problems of Kewaunee and most recently in Fond Du Lac, should be lessons learned that we cannot act without proper research. The problems are not limited to Wisconsin. They are cited all over the world.
All we are asking is that you site the turbines responsibly. Nobody is against green energy, but it is not appropriate to destroy someones life by siting a turbine on top of them, just to collect government subsidies.
I say again, to those that played a part in the creation and adoption of the ordinance to protect the people you represent, you should be commended.GREAT JOB ! "

Nate wrote on Aug 22, 2008 10:37 AM:

" I bet the people of Monroe County tried to ban cars when they were invented. Join the rest of the country people!!! WI is not the only place with these issues and they seem to have all figured it out. "

lewcefur wrote on Aug 21, 2008 1:05 PM:

" Finally, local town government develops a solid comprehensive ordinance. Good job to both communities. This is what government should be. Not a bunch of red tape that you see at the county, state and federal level. Governance by the people and for the people. "

Gerry wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:07 AM:

" Great Job Wilton and Ridgeville town boards on adopting a very comprehensive wind ordinance that your county would not do. It's obvious you compromised on the set back distance. I have turbines 3/4 of a mile from my home built by Invenergy using GE 1.5mw turbines. I can hear that turbine inside my house on many occasions effecting my wife and 13 year old son's sleep. A mile would be the best, safe distance from a home. The statement of saving other energy is a hoax. Coal and nuclear plants can not cut back because wind is so unreliable. We should be streamlining nuclear power plants into operation to give us the cleanest, most reliable and economical electricity. We are paying for wind energy in higher rates and in tax subsidies just to make the energy companies wealthy. Take a few moments to think about all of the energy needed to crush the gravel for the tower roads, 300+yards of concrete, 55,000+ pounds of rebar, 395,000 pounds of steel and material above the ground, plus all the workers driving to and from the towers just to put them up. There are many other drains on our energy supplies to get these industrial turbines erected and operational. No one mentions the electricity from the existing grid system to get the turbines turning each time the wind changes direction or dies down. Great job town officials in caring for your constituents! "

Gerry wrote on Aug 21, 2008 7:52 AM:

" Great job Towns of Wilton and Ridgeville. Your residents ALL should be thanking their town boards for looking out for their health and saftety. I live at Brownsville, WI inside an Invenergy industrial wind farm. It has invaded our lives like you would not believe. Health effects we have experienced are: headaches, nausea, light headedness, lack of sleep because we hear them in all rooms of our house, ringing and buzzing in the ears, anger, anxiety and generally being tense due to the constant sound like that of a jet flying over or like the thumping of your heart if you listened in a stethoscope or like the sound of a Chinook helicopter. Anger because our elected officials including the PSC have allowed this to happen to us and anger from the constant aggrivating sounds. Invenergy tells you "They don't make much noise", to get you to sign leases and good neighbor contracts. What lies. I have 5 of these monsters within 3/4 of a mile from my home. I hear turbines 1560', 2480' and 3/4 of a mile from my home both inside and outside the house. Again the residents of Wilton and Ridgeville townships should be thanking and praising their boards for the wonderful job they did in adopting this wind ordinance. "

Great wrote on Aug 20, 2008 4:44 PM:

" Now the Government thinks they can control the wind. How about they work on the rain next? "

Cathy Bembinster wrote on Aug 20, 2008 1:08 PM:

" The town governments responsibility concerning industrial wind turbines is to protect Public Health and Safety. To note, this does not include their opinion on renewable energy, they are two separate and very distinct issues. Public Hearing notices are posted in advance as a vehicle for citizens to voice their acceptance or their opposition to important issues as in the Town of Wilton's ordinance for Large Wind Turbines. That being said, if one looks at what governmental protection had been provided prior to your towns wind ordinance concerning the siting of large wind turbines, you would have only found the State of Wisconsins Wind Ordinance Draft which has no medical or scientific basis to support their setbacks of 1000 feet from your home or a 50dBA sound limit 24/7/365 days a year. If you look further into the states setbacks by obtaining the Public Records from the Public Service Commission you will see that very little discussion was spent on Public Health and Safety. "

reglad wrote on Aug 20, 2008 11:13 AM:

" Just another reason thses counties languish in poverty.Shortsightedness. "

glad wrote on Aug 20, 2008 10:57 AM:

" I am glad to hear of the Town of Wilton has the health and safety of its residents in mind. Who else but the town board has the power to protect the residents? I live in a town in southern Wisconsin and our town board recently adopted an ordinance that sounds very simular to the Town of Wilton ordinance. Our ordinance was researched and is completely backed up by medical and scientific facts. We are all for renewable energy but not at the cost of our resident's health. It would be too late to correct ill effects of the wind turbines after they are already built. If it is done right the first time everyone will benefit. Sometimes it is easy to let money make our decisions for us. I say thanks to the Townof Wilton Town Board! "

Its a scam wrote on Aug 20, 2008 10:35 AM:

" I wanted to take a minute and respond to this article. It upsets me to hear the Not In My Back Yard thing. All these people that say that usaully don't have a wind turbine 1100 feet from there home. Well, I do. And it is from the same crooked company (Invenergy) that is trying to put one in Monroe County. Go to betterplan.squarespace.com and see for yourselve. Watch "Wind Isn't Free". This is a video that I made of the ill affects that have been slammed into our lives. This project has done nothing but create hard feelings and ruin what was once good relationship amongest good neighbors. You people need to wake up. It will take 15 GE 1.5 Megawatt wind turbines turning in a 28 mile per hour wind to provide enough electricity for one leading manufacture in Fond du Lac County. What will you do when the wind isn't blowning. And when it does blow, what do think happens? Do the coal plants say "Hey Charlie, shut the boilers off, we got wind today". These 4 million dollar spinning toliet brushes will be paid for by the rate and taxpayers of Wisconsin and the true benefits ($) will be taken in by these out of state LLC's. Here's a question to ask next time a energy company official talks about the great things that surround wind farms. Ask them if they have a wind turbine 1100 feet from their house? Ask them if they can see one from their front window? Ask them how close they are from the nearest wind farm?
You judge for yourself by their answer. These things are not quiet, and they cast a shadow flicker that is unbelieveable. Look at the video and judge for yourself. Don't be taken in by all the lies that come with wind farms. If this is such a good thing, then why do they have too pay everyone to make it happen.

Larry Wunsch
Pinwheel Junkyard
Brownsville, Wisconisn "

Minnesota wrote on Aug 20, 2008 9:18 AM:

" Have you seen all the new ones recently built in Minnesota along the interstate? A few of them are no futher than a couple hundred yards from the road. What about the 'flying' ice or all the 'light flicker?' They must not get that out in the flat land of Minnesota. And for me personally, I think the 50-60 that you can see at one time does more "harm" to the landscape than the few you would see scattered around on the ridge. "

Backward wrote on Aug 20, 2008 9:11 AM:

" Wisconsin----Home of the "Not in MY backyard" "

Matt Gaboda wrote on Aug 20, 2008 8:32 AM:

" It's funny how people complain about how terrible the ordinances are, yet they voice opinions that do not pertain to the specific state statute concerning large scale wind energy. It's easy to go with the everything " Green " mentality, it's much harder to stop, research, and rationally come to a conclusion based on science not emotion. The residents of Ridgeville and Wilton should be appreciative of the responsible actions of there towns. It's nice to see when facts trump misconceptions. "

SwindDLE for Sheople wrote on Aug 20, 2008 8:06 AM:

" Confused and Modern Times: don't confuse the topic at hand, the local governments allowing wind farms is ill concieved in the fact that it does not consider the quality of living for people who have invested their lives in living in a beautiful area. The topic of global warming is a seperate issue, and should not fuel this debate. If you want the facts about wind energy and it's net impact on carbon footprint and climate, look at europe. Some countries are pulling back plans to build more turbines after 15 years of development has shown negative energy savings. Don't join the herd just because you read biased reporting in the paper... "

Jim from Union wrote on Aug 20, 2008 8:04 AM:

" As an elected official Rick Irwin has an intrinsic responsibility to protect the citizens. He has personally spent 1000s of hours of his own time researching the health effects of large wind turbines. His recommendations for setbacks are based on rock solid scientific evidence. The people that question why we cant just put up turbines will be the first ones to ask what have you done to me, to my town, after they are installed. Wisconsin cant be all things to all people. We dont have a wind resource. We all need to trust elected officials like Mr. Irwin and others that are doing their best to keep us safe and healthy. "

Lynda Barry-Kawula wrote on Aug 19, 2008 5:01 PM:

" One very important reason residents should be glad the towns of Ridgeville and Wilton adopted ordinances with the 2640 setback is Flight for Life helicopter access. In Fond du Lac county, Flight for Life has issued a statement saying they won't land in areas of the wind farms there. If you'd like to see the Flight for Life statement, go to betterplan.squarespace.com. Town officials who put the health, safety and welfare of residents over wind developer's profits are a treasure. The towns of Ridgeville and Wilton are lucky to have them. To visit towns that aren't so lucky, head up to Byron in Fond du Lac county. At the betterplan.squarespace.com website you can watch this a recently shot video of what a Fond du Lac resident is forced to live with since the turbines came to his town with setbacks of 1000 feet. Scroll down to the 8/16/08 posting. "

crazzey kid wrote on Aug 19, 2008 3:19 PM:

" i wish i could pout one on my land but people are afraid and i dont think it would be all that dangerous with proper mantinance "

Real Patriot wrote on Aug 19, 2008 2:36 PM:

" This is a disturbing trend. And what is the significance of only targeting facilities of less than 100 megs? All that does is discourage any small scale units that you or I may want to add to our own property. Or does this only apply to "commercial facilities"? Vary vague and ill-conceived. This will come back to bite them. "

reedgar wrote on Aug 19, 2008 1:31 PM:

" Whi is proposing willy nilly? "

edgar wrote on Aug 19, 2008 9:47 AM:

" Many areas of Minnesota and Iowa are flat, windy, and sparsely populated. These locations are excellent for installing groups of wind generators. Much better than siting them willynilly all over the Coulee Region where the topography is completely different. It's an inherently more efficient approach and there will be fewer conflicts over land use. "

welcome to la la land wrote on Aug 19, 2008 8:50 AM:

" I have often wondered why the state of Wisconsin has the motto of FORWARD when I witness the archaic backward thinking that goes on.
All the states surrounding Wisconsin are active in new innovative energy alternatives and Wisconsin stumbles along with the heads in the sand.
It is the age old BANANA concept(Build Absolutlety Nothing Anywhere Near Anything) "

Confused wrote on Aug 18, 2008 7:22 PM:

" Everyone wants cleaner cheaper energy, and we hear how Global Warming is destroying the world, but when it comes right down to doing something about it what do you hear - - -


NOT IN MY BACK YARD! "

modern times wrote on Aug 18, 2008 12:48 PM:

" Drive through Moinnesota and Iowa and you will see they are building wind mills like crazy while we sit and argue. "


PLEASE NOTE: Comments on stories that frequently update through the day disappear with each update.
The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Tomah Journal.

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Log In - If you have already signed up with The Tomah Journal, please sign in now!
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, The Tomah Journal requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
*Address:
*City:
*State:
*Zip Code:
 

About Us | Advertise Online | Contact Us | Disclaimer | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | RSS | Webmaster | Website Directory
Copyright © 2010 The Tomah Journal. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.